• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches, Earthquakes, and the Ring of Fire
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids and Meteoroids
    • The Origin of Earth's Radioactivity
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

Below is the online edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood, by Dr. Walt Brown. Copyright © Center for Scientific Creation. All rights reserved.

Click here to order the hardbound 8th edition (2008) and other materials.

[ Frequently Asked Questions > Is the Hydroplate Theory Consistent with the Bible? ]

Is the Hydroplate Theory Consistent with the Bible?

Without hearing from eyewitnesses, police can usually reconstruct the general outlines of an automobile accident by carefully studying the evidence, such as skid marks and wreckage. So also, some details of the flood can be pieced together by studying its wreckage. Part II of this book has shown that the hydroplate theory is supported by ample scientific evidence. However, good witnesses provide details consistent with the physical evidence as well as information we might never learn elsewhere. Here, you will see that the hydroplate theory is also consistent with the Bible, which records eyewitness accounts of the flood.

For example, the flood was initiated by God because of man’s sin. We may never understand the precise event that God used (or allowed) to physically trigger the flood;1 however, once started, other events must have occurred whose consequences, or “wreckage,” we can still see. Examples include the jigsaw fit of the continents; rapid burial and preservation of trillions upon trillions of fossils in layered rocks; marine fossils on every major mountain range; crumpled mountains; coal, oil, and methane deposits; frozen mammoths; strange features on the ocean floor; earthquakes and volcanic eruptions; the Ring of Fire and earth’s core; gouged out canyons; comets, asteroids, and meteorites; earth’s radioactivity; and hundreds of other consequences. One can place these events in a cause-and-effect sequence that (1) conforms to scientific laws, (2) explains details of these observations, and (3) provides a greater understanding of this global cataclysm. That is the purpose of the hydroplate theory.

Table 26 shows the close correspondence between the biblical description of the flood and the hydroplate theory.

Table 26. Comparison of Biblical Chronology with Major Events of the Hydroplate Theory

Biblical Chronology

Hydroplate Theory

Day 2 of Creation Week: Water covered the earth. (Gen 1:2) Then “a raqia” separates liquid water above from liquid water below. (Gen 1:6–7)

During Creation Week: A layer of water is placed below earth’s crust (a raqia, or pressed-out solid). [See “What Does ‘Raqia’ Mean?” on page 474 for further details.]

Day 3 of Creation Week: The waters below the heavens are gathered into one place, and dry land appears. (Gen 1:9)

Water above the crust drains into depressions and dry land appears. (A rock crust, 200 million square miles in area and resting on a layer of trapped subterranean water, will deform. Portions will sink to the subterranean chamber floor and resemble tapered pillars; the displaced water will lift other portions of the crust out of the water. Land will appear.)1

On one day, 1,656 years after Creation (according to the Hebrew Bible), all the fountains of the great deep2 burst open and the flood begins. “Geshem3 rain” begins. (Gen 7:11)

Rupture Phase: Tidal pumping heats the subterranean water to the point where it becomes supercritical and slowly weakens the crust. Eventually, a tension crack propagates around the earth in about 2 hours, releasing subterranean water. Fountains of muddy water and rocks jet high above the earth and quickly become extremely cold—almost absolute zero (-  460°F).4 Mammoths are frozen in supercold, muddy hail falling from above the atmosphere. Comets, asteroids, and meteoroids form from some of the high velocity water and rocks that escape earth. [See pages 252–348.]

The 40 days and 40 nights of “geshem rain” ends. (Gen 7:4,12)

Flood Phase: Rising flood waters blanket and suppress the jetting fountains of the great deep. Sediments from the muddy water bury (and eventually fossilize) plants and animals.

Flood waters rise until the 150th day, when they cover all preflood mountains. (Gen 7:19–24)

High-pressure water continues to gush up into the flood waters. Liquefaction sorts sediments and dead plants and animals.  Salt domes, coal, oil, and methane begin forming.

 

 

 

150th Day: A wind passes over the earth. Waters slowly begin to subside.5 Ark lands on the mountains of Ararat. (Gen 8:1–4)

Continental-Drift Phase: Mid-Atlantic Ridge buckles up; Atlantic floor rises and western Pacific subsides, so the hydroplates accelerate downhill, sliding on a layer of lubricating water.

When the massive hydroplates decelerate and crash, they are crushed, thickened, buckled, and heated in a gigantic compression event.6 Overthrusting occurs in some places. Continents take on present shapes. As mountains buckle upward, air is displaced, causing a great wind. The earth begins a slow 34°–57° roll, so the poles shift. [See pages 125–128.]

150th – 371st Day: Passengers stay on Ark.

Recovery Phase: Hostile environment: earthquakes begin; inner earth melts; ocean trenches, Ring of Fire, and methane hydrates form; flood basalts and volcanoes erupt; water drains; continents shift; vegetation reestablished; and Ice Age begins. Lower sea level facilitates land migration and allows the formation of tablemounts and submarine canyons. Plateaus are lifted hydraulically.Breaching of natural dams carve large continental canyons, such as the Grand Canyon.

371st Day: Ark off-loaded. (Gen 8:15–19)

371st Day to the present. [See Endnote 12 on page 427.]

The following verses speak of events similar to those described in the hydroplate theory. Taken collectively, they provide support for the following statements in bold. Some passages may be metaphors referring to ancient demonstrations of God’s power.

1. Large quantities of subterranean water existed in the ancient past.

  • Psalm 24:2. ... He has founded it [the earth] upon the seas ...
  • Psalm 33:7. ... He gathers the waters of the sea together as a heap; He lays up the deeps in storehouses ... (A storehouse is a closed container that preserves something you may use later. God used that water when it was brought forth as a flood. Many storehouses, or interconnected chambers, held the subterranean water.)
  • Psalm 104:3. He lays the beams of His upper chambers in the waters ...7 [Pillars were formed.]
  • Psalm 136:6. ... [He] spread out the earth above the waters ...
  • II Peter 3:5. ... the earth was formed out of water and by water ...1

2. These subterranean waters, under extreme pressure, burst forth, bringing on the flood.8

  • Genesis 7:11–12. ... the fountains of the great deep burst open,9 and the floodgates10 of the sky were opened.  And rain fell ...11
  • Job 38:8–11. ... who enclosed the sea with doors, when bursting forth, it went out from the womb; when I made a cloud its garment ...
  • Psalm 18:15. ... the channels of water appeared, and the foundations of the world were laid bare ...
  • Proverbs 3:20. ... the deeps were broken up and the skies dripped dew ...

3. Some supercritical subterranean water is still jetting up from beneath the ocean floor. [See Figure 55 on page 123.][See page 120.]

  • Job 38:16a. Have you entered into the springs of the sea?

4. The deepest recesses on the ocean floor are trenches. [See Figure 80 on page 149.][See page 120.]

  • Job 38:16b. Or have you walked in the recesses of the deep?

5. A massive hailstorm occurred.

  • Exodus 9:18, 24. ... I will send a very heavy hail, such as has not been seen in Egypt from the day it was founded until now. ... So there was hail, and fire flashing continually in the midst of the hail, very severe, such as had not been in all the land of Egypt since it became a nation. [Both verses suggest that an even larger hail and lightning storm than the one God inflicted on Pharaoh occurred before Egypt became a nation. If so, that more powerful hail and lightning storm was presumably during the flood.]12

6. After 40 days and 40 nights, the avalanche of rain (geshem3 rain) stopped, because the layer of water rising on the earth blanketed and suppressed the high jetting of the fountains of the great deep. However, high-pressure, subterranean waters continued to gush out and add to the rising flood water. On the 150th day, flood waters covered all the sinking1 preflood mountains. Then, the floodgates were closed by the hydroplates slowly settling onto the chamber floor, pinching shut the outward flowing water.

  • Genesis 7:12. And the [geshem (see Endnote 10)] rain fell upon the earth for forty days and forty nights.
  • Genesis 7:18–19, 24. ... the water prevailed13 and increased greatly ... so all the high mountains everywhere under the heavens were covered. ... and the waters prevailed for one hundred and fifty days.
  • Genesis 8:2. Also, the fountains of the deep and the floodgates of the sky were closed, and the rain from the sky was restrained.

7. During the compression event, the continents crushed and thickened and mountains dramatically rose, each in hours.6 Then the flood waters receded.

  • Psalm 104:6b–9. ... the waters were standing above the mountains. At Thy rebuke they fled; at the sound of Thy thunder they hurried away. The mountains rose; the valleys sank down to the place which Thou didst establish for them. Thou didst set a boundary that they [the waters] may not pass over; that they may not return to cover the earth.14
  • A possible description of some events in earth’s early history may be found in Proverbs 8:22–29.

8. Before the flood, the Earth probably had a 360-day year and may have had a 30-day lunar month. As Genesis 1:14–16a states, the Sun and Moon were created as “very good” time keepers. The 150th day of the flood was exactly 5 months after the fountains of the great deep broke loose. [See Genesis 7:11, 7:24, and 8:4.] Five 30-day months would be 150 days; twelve 30-day months would be 360 days. The flood may have altered a 30-day lunar orbit. [See Endnote 35 on page 176, Figure 158 on page 288, and "Did the Preflood Earth Have a 30-Day Lunar Month?" on page 530.]

9. The flood was a catastrophic event that involved far more than falling rain. The earth shook violently and was accompanied by continuous thunder; the erupting fountains of the great deep darkened the sky; some launched rocks fell back to earth as glowing hailstones; powerful electrical activity (generated by the fluttering crust and the piezoelectric effect) was unleashed, and torrents of water emerged from below.

  • Psalm 18:7–15. Then the earth shook and quaked; and the foundations of the mountains were trembling and were shaken, ... He made darkness His hiding place, His canopy around Him, darkness of waters, thick clouds of the skies ... The Lord also thundered in the heavens, and the Most High uttered His voice, hailstones and coals of fire ... lightening flashes in abundance ... . Then the channels of water appeared, and the foundations of the world were laid bare ...

10. The Book of Jasher.15 Although not inspired scripture, The Book of Jasher (which means “The Book of the Upright”) is mentioned in Joshua 10:13 and II Samuel 1:18. Jasher 6:11 vividly describes the beginning of the flood.

And on that day, the Lord caused the whole earth to shake, and the sun darkened, and the foundations of the world raged, and the whole earth was moved violently, and the lightning flashed, and the thunder roared, and all the fountains in the earth were broken up, such as was not known to the inhabitants before; and God did this mighty act, in order to terrify the sons of men that, there might be no more evil upon earth.

No original manuscript of The Book of Jasher can be located today. At least three different books claim to be The Book of Jasher. All but one can be dismissed as bogus, based on linguistic and other problems. However, details in The Book of Jasher, which contains 91 chapters and was translated from Hebrew in 1625, show that Jasher is probably a copy of the book mentioned in Joshua and II Samuel.16

Jasher is not scripture, but conforms historically to the Bible at many points, provides interesting details, and was obviously well known when Joshua and Samuel were written. One also sees a fascinating flow of over 3,000 years of Hebrew and Egyptian history—from creation to the Israelites entry into the Promised Land. Some parts are exaggerations that may have been inserted since the original Jasher was written. Wayne Simpson,15 who provides an extensive analysis of the book, believes it is a detailed record of Abraham’s family compiled by his descendants over many generations, with large sections contributed by Joseph when he was Vizier of Egypt—second only to Pharaoh. Certainly, Jasher is very ancient, at least 2,300 years old.

If you have read “The Origin of Earth’s Radioactivity” on pages 350–395, “the lightning flashed” in Jasher 6:11, Exodus 9:24, and Psalm 18:14 will carry special meaning, as will the fluttering crust and pounding pillars with the words “caused the whole earth to shake,” and “the foundations of the world raged.”

10. Isaiah (Is 24:18–20) uses terminology that likens a future global catastrophe to the destructiveness of the flood.

For the windows above are opened, and the foundations of the earth shake. The earth is broken asunder, The earth is split through, The earth is shaken violently. The earth reels to and fro like a drunkard ...

We know there will not be another global flood (Genesis 9:11), so Isaiah is not saying the future destruction will be by flood waters. But there are other similarities, which numerous commentators have described as an echo of the flood. Keil and Delitzsch, in their highly respected Bible commentary, attribute the flood terminology to Isaiah’s purpose in describing this judgement as a direct act of God that totally destroys the earth. They also point out that the “foundations of the earth” are “the internal supports upon which the visible crust of the earth rests.”17 The hydroplate theory calls those supports pillars—the thousands of points where the crust, because of its varying density and thickness, touched the floor of the subterranean water chamber.

II Peter 3:5–7 also reminds us of the flood of Noah just before describing a future global destruction by fire. Also notice the similarity of Is 24:18–20 with Jasher 6:11.

Final Thoughts. If we accept the Bible’s eyewitness accounts of the flood, we should also be ready to give explanations for some obvious questions: Where did enough water come from to cover all the mountains on earth? Where did all that water go afterwards? After the flood, how could animals cross oceans and migrate to every continent on earth? Did it rain before the flood, and if not, how was the fertile earth watered, and what fed its rivers? How could such violent rain fall so rapidly at the beginning of the flood but end after 40 days, even though the flood waters rose and covered all the mountains on the 150th day of the flood? If the flood’s 40 days of rain formed by condensation, that rain should have stopped after a few days, because rain would have removed the condensation nuclei, necessary to form rain. The hydroplate theory answers these questions and others.

Preflood Rivers

The preceding description of preflood meteorology helps us understand what would otherwise be the four strangest rivers the earth ever had. Genesis 2:10–14 states:

Now a river flowed out of Eden to water the garden; and from there it divided and became four rivers. The name of the first is Pishon; it flows around the whole land of Havilah ... And the name of the second river is Gihon; it flows around the whole land of Cush. And the name of the third river is Tigris; it flows east of Assyria. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.

From our postflood perspective, rivers seldom divide into two downstream rivers, let alone four, and certainly rivers do not flow completely around a land—at least today. How can this be explained? [Note: The Hebrew word for “around” (sabab) means “encircled,” “circumference,” or “completely around.”]

Rain, as we know it, began after the flood. Some rain soaks into the ground, but most7 becomes runoff which always drains downhill. Even rain that eventually soaks into the ground is downhill runoff for some distance. It is this downhill flow that produces the branching, tributary patterns that characterize today’s rivers.

We must also remember that the flood deposited sediments that average, at least on the continents, slightly more than a mile in depth. As explained in the liquefaction chapter [pages 186–198], most of those sediments were stratified into layers that are now parallel to the slope of the land. Therefore, even today’s subsurface water tends to flow in the direction of surface runoff when seeping downward from a permeable layer to a less permeable layer. Also, vast amounts of dissolved cementing agents, such as limestone and silica, were released from the subterranean chambers during the flood, so most of today’s sedimentary layers are cemented rock, much less permeable than preflood soils.

Preflood precipitation, on the other hand, was a very heavy dew, “a mist that rose up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground.” The total precipitation volume per year, as (as explained in bold on page 441) was much greater than today’s rainfall, and the preflood, heavy dew was distributed much more slowly, uniformly, and regularly over the land (actually, daily, during the cool of each night). Therefore, preflood condensation had a much greater tendency to soak into the soil than rain, and preflood groundwater would not have encountered layered strata or relatively impermeable sedimentary rock. In what direction would all that ground water flow? Always in the direction of decreasing pressure—not necessarily in the downhill direction as in today’s surface runoff. That means that preflood subsurface flow would eventually emerge as springs in low-elevation valleys—valleys that would have been preflood river beds.

How does this explain the strange preflood rivers? Valleys frequently intersect other valleys, and hills are often surrounded by valleys. Therefore, preflood valleys would sometimes carry rivers that branched into other rivers, and a moatlike river might encircle a preflood hill. The high ground encircled by the “moat” could have been even continental in size. (Every continent today is surrounded by a topographic low.)

Of course, the flow of these preflood, moatlike rivers would be slow and downhill. If there were no surface outlet, the width and depth of the moat would increase, so more evaporation would occur. Also, more of the river’s water would soak into the river bed and emerge as springs in preflood seas, the lowest regions on the preflood earth. Eventually, the moat would lose about as much water from evaporation and seepage as it gained from ground water draining into the moat. Rivers not constrained to enclosed valleys flowed into large seas. Today’s Tigris and Euphrates were probably named because they reminded the flood survivors of the preflood Tigris and Euphrates.

Today, some do not believe there was a catastrophic, global flood. They think it was a relatively mild, local event, or avoid discussing it because too many questions would be raised that they don’t believe can be answered or that might subject them to ridicule. The problem for most of us is grasping the flood’s almost unimaginable magnitude and power, which is difficult without a close study of the biblical texts and the scientific evidence from many disciplines.

Unfortunately, a few Christians and their organizations have contributed to a loss of meaning in the biblical description of the flood by teaching unscientific theories—such as the canopy theory or the catastrophic plate tectonic theory. Those theories require miracles not mentioned in the Bible and contradict many biblical details, such as “all the fountains of the great deep” that broke loose on one day. Almost any unscientific theory can be made to work if we could claim that a miracle solved our scientific problem. [See Figure 225 on page 510.]

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

Updated on Wednesday, May 22 05/22/13 06:27:00
Copyright © 1995–2013
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com

(602) 955-7663