• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids and Meteoroids
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This is the online edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
(8th Edition) by Dr. Walt Brown. The online version of the book is designed to be read online.
The 7th Edition (PDF version or hardbound print version) may be ordered.
Copyright © 1995–2008, Center for Scientific Creation. All rights reserved.

Click here to order the hardbound print edition of this online book.

[ The Fountains of the Great Deep > The Origin of Comets > Details Relating to the Meteor Stream Theory ]

Details Relating to the Meteor Stream Theory

60. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailFormation Mechanism.  Particles colliding in space tend to fragment, not merge.111 Second, even if they always stuck together, they would grow very slowly—on the order of 3 billion years for gas to form particles only 10-5 cm in diameter.112 Third, dust particles that formed this way would be more uniform in size than those in comets. Fourth, colliding ice particles would vaporize the weakly bound ice molecules, destroying, not forming, comets.

61. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailIce on Moon and Mercury.  Same as item 14 on page 283.

62. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailCrystalline Dust.  Same as item 32 on page 284.

63. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailRandom Perihelion Directions, circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailOrbit Directions and Inclinations. Particles in meteor streams were supposedly formed by the same unknown process as particles that now compose planets. If so, meteoroids and comets would have prograde orbits near the ecliptic. However, 53% of the observed long-period comets are in retrograde orbits, and almost all are far from the ecliptic.

64. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailSmall Perihelions.  Passing stars might perturb long-period comets, but comet perihelions would be scattered—not clustered, as they are, in the 1–3 AU range.

65. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailJupiter’s Family.  Same as item 53 on page 286.

66. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailComposition.  Same as item 16 on page 283.

67. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailHeavy Hydrogen.  Comets have 20 times more heavy hydrogen than this theory would predict.

68. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailSmall Comets.  See item 17 on page 283.

69. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailMissing Meteorites.  See item 18 on page 283.

70. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailRecent Meteor Streams.  See item 9 on page 282.

71. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailOther/Scattering.  Solar wind, the Poynting-Robertson effect, perturbations by planets, and tidal effects disperse particles in a meteor stream, preventing them from merging to become a comet.

As the water in a short-period comet evaporates into the vacuum of space, its dust particles remain in orbits similar to the comet’s orbit. Thus, comets produce meteor streams, not the reverse.

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This site is best viewed with a screen resolution of 1024 x 768 (XGA) or higher and a browser that supports cascading style sheets.
We have tested the site in Internet Explorer (Win), Netscape (Win), Safari (Mac), and Firefox (Mac and Win).
Please let us know if you have any suggestions or find any problems with the site.

Updated on Saturday, August 16
Copyright © 1995–2008
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com

(602) 955-7663