• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids and Meteoroids
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This is the online edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
(8th Edition) by Dr. Walt Brown. The online version of the book is designed to be read online.
The 7th Edition (PDF version or hardbound print version) may be ordered.
Copyright © 1995–2008, Center for Scientific Creation. All rights reserved.

Click here to order the hardbound print edition of this online book.

[ The Fountains of the Great Deep > The Origin of Comets > Details Relating to the Interstellar Capture Theory ]

Details Relating to the Interstellar Capture Theory

72. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailFormation Mechanism.  In space, small particles colliding at high speeds rarely stick together. Because these particles have tiny spheres of influence, they should hardly ever capture each other to form larger particles—let alone comets—even over billions of years. Besides, collisions, which would occur only rarely, would be more likely to scatter any grouping of particles held together by their weak mutual gravity than to form larger particles. No experimental evidence has shown how particles could merge or condense in the vacuum of space, or how they would produce such a wide range of sizes.

Even if billions of dust particles somehow stuck together to form pebbles, each pebble would be a long way from being the size of a comet. As the pebbles fell toward the Sun, their spheres of influence would shrink, not grow. Nor would gases surround each pebble to assist in capture. Therefore, they would not merge into larger clusters to form comets.

73. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailIce on Moon and Mercury.  Same as item 14 on page 283.

74. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailCrystalline Dust.  Same as item 32 on page 284.

75. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailRandom Perihelion Directions, circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailOrbit Directions and Inclinations. If comets formed on a converging axis between the Sun and a colliding dust or gas cloud, as this theory proposes (page 276), perihelions and orbital planes should lie in specific directions; they do not.

76. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailSmall Perihelions. If long-period comets formed along a converging axis that extended perhaps 50,000 AU from the Sun, many should fall directly into the Sun from a specific direction.  This is not observed.

77. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailJupiter’s Family.  Same as item 39 on page 285.

78. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailComposition.  Same as item 16 on page 283.

79. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailHeavy Hydrogen.  Same as item 67 on page 286.

80. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailSmall Comets.  See item 17 on page 283.

81. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailMissing Meteorites.  See item 18 on page 283.

82. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailRecent Meteor Streams.  See item 9 on page 282.

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This site is best viewed with a screen resolution of 1024 x 768 (XGA) or higher and a browser that supports cascading style sheets.
We have tested the site in Internet Explorer (Win), Netscape (Win), Safari (Mac), and Firefox (Mac and Win).
Please let us know if you have any suggestions or find any problems with the site.

Updated on Saturday, August 16
Copyright © 1995–2008
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com

(602) 955-7663