• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids and Meteoroids
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This is the online edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
(7th Edition) by Dr. Walt Brown. The online version of the book is designed to be read online.
A PDF version or hardbound print version may be ordered.
Copyright © 1995–2008, Center for Scientific Creation. All rights reserved.

Click here to order the hardbound print edition of this online book.

[ The Fountains of the Great Deep > The Origin of Comets > Details Relating to the Exploded Planet Theory ]

Note: From here to page 281, the reader may wish to examine only discussions concerning theories of personal interest.

Details Relating to the Exploded Planet Theory

13. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailFormation Mechanism.  Explosions produce a wide range of fragment sizes. Rock fragments from an exploded planet would vary from the size of dust up to maybe a quarter of the planet itself. The rocks seen in comets and on asteroids are much more uniform in size. Also, comet dust is mixed uniformly within comet ice. How would a planet, before exploding, have dust mixed within its water?

14. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailIce on Moon and Mercury.  It is highly unlikely that billions of tons of ice from a distant explosion 3,200,000 years ago would still survive and be found in craters on the Moon and Mercury.

15. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailJupiter’s Family.  If comets suddenly formed 3,200,000 years ago, why would Jupiter’s large family now have so many comets with life spans of only about 12,000 years?

16. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailComposition.  If comets formed as this theory claims, why would they have organic matter, including methane and ethane? Vegetation and bacteria could not originate in the cold, dim asteroid belt, 2.8 AU from the Sun. This theory does not explain any of the discoveries of the Stardust mission or the six discoveries of the Deep Impact mission listed on page 267.

17. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailSmall Comets.  Comets originating 2.8 AU or farther from the Sun 3,200,000 years ago would not concentrate small comets at Earth’s orbit today. Certainly, they would not tend to strike Earth ten times more frequently in early November than in mid-January.

18. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailMissing Meteorites. If comets are as old as this theory claims, many more iron meteorites should have been found below the topmost layers of the Earth’s sediments.

19. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailRecent Meteor Streams.  See item 9 above.

20. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailCrater Ages.  If a planet exploded 3,200,000 years ago, many craters on Earth should have corresponding ages. Even if one accepts evolutionary dating techniques, craters do not cluster at that age, or at any age.90

21. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailOther/Scattering.  The total mass of all asteroids is less than 0.05% (about 1/2,300) of the Earth’s mass. Combining all asteroids would hardly produce a planet.

Exploding and dispersing a typical planet requires enormous energy.91 Even if a planet composed of pure TNT suddenly exploded, it would collapse back upon itself because of the large, mutual gravitational attraction of all its pieces. Napier and Dodd have shown that no known chemical, gravitational, or plausible nuclear source of energy appears capable of exploding and scattering any known planet.92 A head-on collision between two planets at 2.8 AU could provide the needed energy but would not evenly disperse comet-size chunks or give them the energy distribution shown in Figure 147 on page 265.

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This site is best viewed with a screen resolution of 1024 x 768 (XGA) or higher and a browser that supports cascading style sheets.
We have tested the site in Internet Explorer (Win), Netscape (Win), Safari (Mac), and Firefox (Mac and Win).
Please let us know if you have any suggestions or find any problems with the site.

Updated on Sunday, May 11
Copyright © 1995–2008
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com

(602) 955-7663