• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids and Meteoroids
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This is the online edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
(8th Edition) by Dr. Walt Brown. The online version of the book is designed to be read online.
The 7th Edition (PDF version or hardbound print version) may be ordered.
Copyright © 1995–2008, Center for Scientific Creation. All rights reserved.

Click here to order the hardbound print edition of this online book.

[ The Fountains of the Great Deep > The Origin of Comets > Details Relating to the Revised Oort Cloud Theory ]

Details Relating to the Revised Oort Cloud Theory

45. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailFormation Mechanism, circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailHeavy Hydrogen.  Same as item 30 on page 284.

46. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailIce on Moon and Mercury.  Same as item 14 on page 283.

47. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailCrystalline Dust.  Same as item 32 on page 284.

48. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailNear-Parabolic Comets.  See item 33.

49. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailRandom Perihelion Directions.  See item 34.

50. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailNo Incoming Hyperbolic Orbits.  Same as item 35 on page 285.

51. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailSmall Perihelions.  Same as item 36 on page 285.

52. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailTwo Separate Populations.  Short-period comets might be explained if comets formed near the giant planets. However, this would not produce the number of needed near-parabolic comets. The average comet flung out toward an Oort cloud, but not expelled from the solar system, would end up far short of where the Oort cloud supposedly is.103  [See Figure 149 on page 271.]

53. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailJupiter’s Family.  Comets in Jupiter’s family have an average life span of only about 12,000 years. They could not have accumulated over millions of years.

54. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailHigh Loss Rates of Comets.  Several locations for cometary nurseries in the giant-planet region have been proposed. Oort favored the asteroid belt, between Mars and Jupiter, if such a nursery was needed to supply the Oort cloud. Later, Fernández showed that, if comets were born near Jupiter, Jupiter would expel too many from the solar system. To account for today’s high loss rate of comets from an Oort cloud would require 10,000 Earth masses of comets in a Jupiter birthing region 4.5 billion years ago—“too large to consider it dynamically reasonable.”104  Jupiter would have to fling 30 times its mass out to the Oort cloud! No planet’s energy and angular momentum could have done the job.105

Fernández favored the region between Uranus and Neptune as the place where comets were born and steadily flung out to the Oort cloud. This would require the least amount of cometary birthing material—about 17 Earth masses, the mass of Neptune. However, it is doubtful that Uranus and Neptune would have had the necessary energy and angular momentum.

Overcrowding is another problem. If so many comets began in the giant planet region, they would often collide and fragment. Only about 5% of the comets needed by an Oort cloud could have been delivered to the Oort cloud.106

Öpik raised a more serious problem. To form comets in the Uranus-Neptune region and then eject them out to an Oort cloud would require about 100 billion years—20 times the assumed age of the solar system.107

In 1950, Gerard Kuiper (KI-per) theorized that material that almost formed a planet should still exist beyond Neptune, 35–50 AU from the Sun.108 This region, which some believe is filled with comets, is now called the Kuiper Belt. Kuiper thought that Pluto expelled the nursery’s comets out to the Oort cloud. Later it was learned that Pluto’s mass was much too small for the job.

Since 1992, ground-based telescopes and the Hubble Space Telescope have detected more than 1,000 large objects in the Kuiper Belt, a region that many had hoped was the source of comets in the solar system and in the Oort cloud. Later, it was realized that these objects were ten times too large (25–1,000 miles in diameter) to be comets and too few in number. A reexamination of that region of the sky by the Hubble Space Telescope has failed to detect a comet reservoir.109

55. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailComposition.  Same as item 16 on page 283.

56. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailSmall Comets.  See item 17 on page 283.

57. circleyellow.jpg Image ThumbnailRecent Meteor Streams.  See item 9 on page 282.

58. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailCrater Ages.  This theory requires a comet nursery containing at least 1013 comets.110 As the giant planets fling some comets out to an Oort cloud, other comets would frequently bombard Earth from close range. The farther back in time, the greater the bombardment rate. As with the original Oort cloud theory, craters from this intense bombardment should be increasingly visible the deeper one looks in Earth’s sedimentary layers. Instead, craters are almost exclusively found in surface layers.

59. circlered.jpg Image ThumbnailOther/Missing Star.  Same as item 44 on page 285.

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This site is best viewed with a screen resolution of 1024 x 768 (XGA) or higher and a browser that supports cascading style sheets.
We have tested the site in Internet Explorer (Win), Netscape (Win), Safari (Mac), and Firefox (Mac and Win).
Please let us know if you have any suggestions or find any problems with the site.

Updated on Saturday, August 16
Copyright © 1995–2008
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com

(602) 955-7663