• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches, Earthquakes, and the Ring of Fire
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids and Meteoroids
    • The Origin of Earth's Radioactivity
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

Below is the online edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood, by Dr. Walt Brown. Copyright © Center for Scientific Creation. All rights reserved.

Click here to order the hardbound 8th edition (2008) and other materials.

[ The Fountains of the Great Deep > Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils > Liquefaction During the Compression Event ]

Liquefaction During the Compression Event

While liquefaction operated during the flood phase, it acted massively once during the compression event, at the end of the continental-drift phase.  [See pages 110–145.]

Visualize a deck of cards sliding across a table. Friction from the table slows the bottom card. That card, in turn, applies a decelerating force on the second card from the bottom. If no card slips, the entire deck, including the top card, will decelerate as a unit. But if a lubricant somehow built up between any two adjacent cards, cards above the lubricated layer would slide over the decelerating cards below.

Likewise, each decelerating granite hydroplate acted on the bottom sedimentary layer riding on the hydroplate. Sedimentary layers, from bottom to top, acted in turn to decelerate the topmost layers. As each water-saturated layer decelerated, it was severely compressed—similar to suddenly squeezing a wet sponge. Sediments, forced into a denser packing arrangement, released water. Sedimentary particles were crushed or broken, so their fragments filled the spaces between particles, releasing even more water. The freed water, then forced up through the sediments, caused massive liquefaction. As the sedimentary layers decelerated and compressed, they became more and more fluid. Eventually, some layers were so fluid that slippage occurred above them, as in our deck of cards. Below that level, extreme compression and liquefaction caused fossils to float up and collect at this watery level where sliding was taking place.The lowest slippage level was the Cambrian-Precambrian interface. Fossils are found almost exclusively above this interface. Therefore, evolutionists interpret the Precambrian as about 90% of all geologic time—a vast period, they believe, before life evolved. A few feet above this global interface are found representatives of all animal and plant phyla. [See "Missing Trunk" on page 12.] This presents a huge problem for evolutionists: How and why did so much life evolve so fast—a phenomenon evolutionists call “the Cambrian explosion”? Again, evolutionists are unaware of global and massive liquefaction and mistakenly measure time by sedimentary layers and their fossils.

liquefaction-grand_canyon_cross_section.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 101: Grand Canyon Cross Section. The tipped and beveled layers are part of the Precambrian. The beveled plane, at the Cambrian-Precambrian interface, is sometimes called The Great Unconformity. A similar, but much smaller, example of tipped and beveled layers is shown in the cross-bedded sandstone in Figure 103. Beveling implies relative motion. Near the top of the Grand Canyon is a 400-foot-thick layer of cross-bedded sandstone. The white arrow points to the quartzite block shown in Figure 102.

In the Grand Canyon, the Cambrian-Precambrian interface is an almost flat, horizontal surface exposed for 66 miles above the Colorado River. Layers above the Cambrian-Precambrian interface are generally horizontal, but layers below are tipped at large angles, and their tipped edges are beveled off horizontally. As slippage began during the compression event, layers below the slippage plane continued to compress to the point where they buckled. The sliding sedimentary block above the slippage plane beveled off the still soft layers being increasingly tipped by horizontal compression below the slippage plane.

liquefaction-quartzite_block_sean&ryan.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 102: Transported Block in the Grand Canyon. In the left figure, notice the large, 5–10-ton block near the center, and the shadows of photographer Jim McDowell (my son-in-law) and two grandsons, Sean and Ryan McDowell. The right figure is an enlargement of the block with Ryan and Sean (left to right).

Geology professor Arthur V. Chadwick brought this block to my attention in 197825 and later in a visit to my office. The block—a very hard material called quartzite—was lifted, transported from right to left, and deposited on layers which, at the time, were soft mud. Other mud layers then blanketed the block. (See the deformed layers below and above the block.) Professor Chadwick correctly identified the lifting force: a very dense, rapidly-flowing, sand/mud/water slurry, which plucked the block off the lower quartzite layer upstream (far to the right of these pictures). Part of that “pink” quartzite layer is seen in the first picture (lower right). The easiest way to lift and transport such a heavy block is in a dense liquefied (and therefore, very buoyant), sediment/water mixture.

This rapid transport, which was immediately above the Cambrian-Precambrian interface, occurred during the compression event. Below the sliding slurry, a sand layer decelerated and compressed first. That compression squeezed up water that lubricated the slide and heated the quartz sand, so it became quartzite.26 Compression also tipped the layers up, causing them to be beveled by the overriding, sliding layers. The camera is looking north; therefore, the slurry slid from east to west, which is consistent with the direction the Americas hydroplate slid away from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. (Evolutionary geologists who do not understand the physics and the rapid continental drift that ended in the compression event, explain the flat Cambrian-Precambrian interface as a result of hundreds of millions of years of erosion. For them, unimaginable time explains everything. Lazy and sloppy thinking.)

See Figure 101 for a cross section of this region. The block is located at 36°7'34.80"N, 112°8'39.60"W. Hikers should not attempt to reach this remote, rugged, off-trail location unless they are in excellent physical condition and have permission from the Grand Canyon Backcountry Office.

Evolutionists have a different interpretation. They believe tipped Precambrian layers are remnants of a former mountain range, because mountains today often have steeply tipped layers. [See Figure 49 on page 113.] The tipped layers are horizontally beveled, so evolutionists say the top of the mountain must have eroded away. That, of course, would take a long time. Millions of years are also needed so seas could flood the area, because fossils of sea-bottom life are found just above the Cambrian-Precambrian interface. Within overlying layers, other fossils are found which required different environments, such as deserts or lagoons, so obviously, even more time is needed. (Unlimited time makes the nearly impossible seem possible—if you don’t think too much about mechanisms.)

liquefaction-tipped_cross-bedded_sandstone.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 103: Cross-Bedded Sandstone. Dry sand can have a maximum slope of only 32 degrees. Cross-bedded sandstone, such as shown here, often has much greater slopes. Therefore, this sand, confined between layers that have since eroded, was probably wet when the layers tipped.

Cross-Bedded Sandstone.  Sand layers had the greatest water content, because sand grains are somewhat rounded, leaving relatively large gaps for water between the particles. Therefore, sand layers were the most fluid during the massive liquefaction that accompanied the compression event. Deceleration forced the sand forward, displacing the water backward. Horizontally compressed sand layers would have slid, tipped, buckled, and beveled individual layers and blocks of layers, exactly what we see in cross-bedded sandstone.  [See Figure 103.]

liquefaction-formation_of_mounds_and_plumes.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 104: Formation of Liquefaction Plumes and Mounds. (a) During the flood phase, global liquefaction sorted water-saturated sediments into nearly horizontal layers. (b) During the compression event, massive liquefaction caused less-dense sand/water mixtures to float up as plumes, through denser overlying layers. (Figure 59 on page 124 shows a similar phenomenon.) Later, if the surface layers were not cemented as well as the sandstone plume, the surface layers could erode away, leaving the harder, more-resistant plume exposed. (c) If a plume spilled out on the ground, a mound would form.

Liquefaction Plumes and Mounds.  The large water content of liquefied sand layers (40%) would have made them quite buoyant. Whenever a low-density, fluid layer (such as a water-sand mixture) underlies a denser, liquefied layer, the lighter fluid, if shaken, will float up in plumes through the denser fluid. Sand plumes that penetrated overlying layers are seen in many places on earth. [See Figures 104–106.]

liquefaction-plume1_in_kodachrome_basin.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 105: Liquefaction Plume 1. A hundred of these plumes are found in Kodachrome Basin State Reserve in south-central Utah, 10 miles east of Bryce Canyon National Park. I am standing at the bottom left of this tall plume.

liquefaction-plume2_in_kodachrome_basin.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 106: Liquefaction Plume 2. This plume can be traced down several hundred feet through the large rock in the bottom half of the picture. The plume grew up from a known horizontal sandstone layer that has identical chemical characteristics.27 After the plume pushed upward, cementing occurred, with the sandstone plume becoming harder than the material it penetrated. The softer layers surrounding the plume later eroded away, leaving the plume exposed. [See Figure 104b.] Notice the person waving at the bottom left of this plume.

Some plumes, especially those rising from thick, laterally extensive sand layers, spilled onto the earth’s surface. This spilling-out resembled volcanic action, except water-saturated sand erupted, not lava. Small liquefaction mounds, as they will be called, appear when liquefaction occurs during earthquakes.28 [See Levin’s description on page 186.] Hundreds of liquefaction mounds are found in basins—former postflood lakes—in the southwestern United States.

Why basins? During the compression event, liquefied water-sand mixtures in many places erupted up onto lake bottoms. Being surrounded and permeated by water, they would have quickly slumped into the shape of an upside-down bowl—a liquefaction mound. As the flood waters drained at the end of the flood, most liquefaction mounds were swept away, because they did not have time to be cemented. However, mounds inside postflood lakes (basins) were cemented as each lake cooled and its dissolved silica and calcium carbonate were forced out of solution. If a lake later breached and dumped its water, the larger cemented mounds could resist the torrent of rushing water and retain their shapes. The basins that held Grand and Hopi Lakes, shown on page 112, contain hundreds of mounds, such as the one in Figure 107. The sudden breaching of those lakes several centuries after the flood carved the Grand Canyon. [See pages 202–235.]

liquefaction-mound_at_rock_point.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 107: Liquefaction Mound.29 This and hundreds of similar sandstone mounds occupy the basin of the former Grand Lake. The breaching of Grand Lake carved the Grand Canyon. [See pages 202–234.]

The compression event produced massive liquefaction in water-saturated sand layers. During the few minutes the liquefaction lasted, some sand-water mixtures erupted, much like a volcano. Here, the eruption was onto the floor of Grand Lake. The large, mushy pile of sand quickly settled into the shape of an upside-down bowl. As the flood waters drained off the continents, this large, wet sand pile was protected, because it was deep in a lake. As the warm lake cooled, silica dissolved in the water was forced out of solution, thereby cementing the mound’s sand grains. A century or so later, when Grand Lake spilled out, rushing water around the mound eroded the softer sediments on which the mound rested, producing the deep “moat” that separates the man at the lower right from the mound.

liquefaction-ayers_rock.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 108: Ayers Rock. This popular tourist attraction in central Australia is 225 miles southwest of Alice Springs. Ayers Rock rises 1,140 feet from the desert floor and has a perimeter of 5.6 miles. Geologists who try to explain the origin of Ayers Rock say its sand came from the Musgrave mountain range 60 miles to the north and was dumped by water at its present spot. To account for its vertical layers, they say the rock “tipped,” but the forces, energy, and mechanisms to do this are never explained. However, most geologists admit they do not know the origin of Ayers Rock.

Ayers Rock has characteristics of both a broad liquefaction plume and a liquefaction mound. [See Figure 104.] Its surface layers (bedding) are nearly vertical, and they connect to a horizontal sandstone layer underground. It formed in the Amadeus Basin, whose contained waters covered and protected it while the flood waters drained from the earth. Probably most soft sediments, through which the plume rose, were swept away when the basin’s lake finally discharged. The many large holes in the sides of Ayers Rock show where water drained out. (Almost 20 miles away, this same, deep horizontal sandstone layer also connects to a series of liquefaction eruptions called the Olgas.)

The sand grains comprising Ayers Rock are jagged but, if exposed to rapid currents, would have become rounded. Had the grains been weathered for thousands of years, they would have become clay. Instead, these grain characteristics are consistent with the gentle currents produced by liquefaction and the rapid cementing in the years after the flood.

liquefaction-small_water_vents.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 109: Small Water Vents. These water vents are smaller than a pebble; others, such as those in Ayers Rock, are larger than a car. Water vents are quite different from the shallow and smooth bowl-like depressions which wind and rain produce.

liquefaction-medium_water_vents.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 110: Medium-Size Water Vents. Geology professor Dr. Douglas A. Block points to one of many holes in the side of a huge liquefaction mound in southern Utah. If these holes were places where rock was weakly cemented, similar holes should be on the tops of mounds. Instead, the tops are smooth. Cementing in mounds and cross-bedded sandstone is remarkably uniform and hard, showing that the cement was uniformly dissolved throughout water that saturated the sand.

Liquefaction mounds have holes in their sides showing where internal water escaped. The channels have collapsed except near the mound’s surface where there was much less collapsing stress. Those holes now look like pock marks. Some have claimed they are erosion features from wind and rain. Obviously, wind and rain would smooth out pock marks, not make them. Besides, these “pock marks,” which will be called water vents, are found only in the sides of mounds, not the tops, where they should be if outside erosion formed them. 

For centuries after the flood, water drained out of mountains and cliffs. Caves were carved by outward flowing water. New inhabitants to an area sought out and settled around these plentiful sources of water. (Thus, many ancient cultures believed that water originated in mountains and flowed out of caves.)30 Years later, as water sources dwindled, communities were forced to leave. Prosperous cultures, such as the Anasazi and cliff-dwellers, suddenly disappeared from an area, causing anthropologists to wonder if disease, war, famine, or drought destroyed those ancient communities. No; their water simply dried up.

  liquefaction-ripple_marks.jpg Image Thumbnail

Figure 111: Ripples on the Continental Divide. These ripple marks, obviously made by water flowing powerfully31 in the direction of my pencil, are found at dozens of locations, within a few hundred feet of the Continental Divide, along Hidden Lake Trail at Logan Pass in Glacier National Park, Montana.32 (The Continental Divide is an imaginary line stretching from Alaska to the southern tip of South America—along the crest of the Rocky Mountain/Andes Mountain chains. Rain falling to the west of the Continental Divide flows toward the Pacific Ocean; rain falling to the east flows toward the Atlantic Ocean.)  Below these rippled sandstone rocks are 7,000 feet of layered—and cemented—sedimentary rocks, whose sediments were deposited one grain at a time through water.

What sequence of events must have occurred to produce all of this? First, about 7,000 feet of sediments had to be deposited on a seafloor and sorted into layers. Next, water had to flow powerfully over the uppermost layer to produce nonsymmetrical ripple marks in wet sand.31 But ripple marks are easily erased, just as sand castles on a beach are destroyed in a few days. Therefore, a thick layer of softer sediments (such as mud) had to rapidly blanket and protect the ripple marks. Then, the seafloor had to be lifted up to form the Rocky and Andes Mountains, a Herculean task requiring gigantic forces and energy. (Notice that plate tectonics provides neither.) Besides, the kinetic energy of a plate moving at only about an inch per year is so trivial that it could never push up a mountain. Later, the sediments were cemented by chemical agents that had to be spread uniformly throughout the billions of cubic miles of loose sediments. Finally, erosion and weathering removed the blanket and exposed the harder sandstone ripples for us to see.

Could the ripples have been formed at their present elevation (about 7,150 feet above sea level)? No. earth does not have enough water to rise uniformly to that elevation.Even if there was at one time that much water, where did it go, and what could lift such thick layers of sediments that high? Could ripples form in high lakes and become cemented?  We don’t see that happening today, nor are the necessary chemicals present. Could the Rocky Mountains have been lifted slowly, over millions of years? The energy, forces, and mechanism for doing so have never been explained, but if the mountains somehow did rise slowly, the peaks of the rising Rockies would experience the greatest erosion and weathering. Based on today’s conditions and measurements, the mountain and its cemented ripple marks would erode faster than the mountain rose.

The hydroplate theory, supported by hundreds of other evidences, easily explains ripples on the Continental Divide. Sediments, eroded by the escaping subterranean waters during the flood, were quickly deposited through those waters. On the continents, the deposits average more than a mile in thickness. Liquefaction sorted most of them into the prominent layers we see today, and fluttering hydroplates produced gigantic waves, causing ripples even on the deep seafloor. The compression event buckled, crushed, and lifted the Rocky Mountains in hours. (That lifting of the seafloor up through the water also produced a powerful, ripple-producing flow.) Prior to the flood, supercritical water in the subterranean chambers dissolved and uniformly spread cementing agents, such as silica and calcium carbonate, throughout the water. Months and years after the flood, the warm flood waters cooled, so those minerals came out of solution, lodged as precipitated solids (or cement) in the tiniest spaces between sedimentary grains. What were the forces, energy, and mechanism that produced ripples on the Continental Divide?  Gravity, the kinetic energy of massive hydroplates sliding downhill, and buckling. [See also "Seashells on Mountaintops" on page 49, "A Whale of a Tale" on page 133, and Figure 49 on page 113.]

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

Updated on Friday, May 17 05/17/13 09:57:12
Copyright © 1995–2013
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com

(602) 955-7663