• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids and Meteoroids
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This is the online edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
(7th Edition) by Dr. Walt Brown. The online version of the book is designed to be read online.
A PDF version or hardbound print version may be ordered.
Copyright © 1995–2008, Center for Scientific Creation. All rights reserved.

Click here to order the hardbound print edition of this online book.

[ The Fountains of the Great Deep > The Origin of Ocean Trenches and the Ring of Fire > Final Thoughts ]

Final Thoughts

Thomas Crowder Chamberlin,69 former president of the University of Wisconsin and the first head of the Geology Department at the University of Chicago, published a famous paper in which he warned researchers not to let one hypothesis dominate their thinking. Instead, they should always have or seek multiple working hypotheses. Chamberlin stated that testing competing hypotheses or theories sharpens one’s analytical skills, develops thoroughness, reduces biases, and helps students and teachers learn to discriminate and think independently rather than simply memorize and conform.

Chamberlin said the dangers of teaching only one explanation are especially great in the earth sciences, where much remains to be learned. The explanation for ocean trenches is an example. The plate tectonic theory dominates the earth sciences. A recent survey of scientists selected it as the most significant theory of the 20th century. Undoubtedly, Darwin’s theory of organic evolution would be voted as the most significant theory of the 19th century. Both dominate, despite growing recognition of their scientific problems, because schools and the media ignore competing explanations. Chamberlin warned about the comfort of conformity.

The subject of “trenches” offers students and teachers a great opportunity. The two competing theories can be explained simply, as was done in Figures 80 and 84.  More information can be added as student interest, time, and ability permit. Relevant topics could include fossils, volcanoes, earthquakes, gravity anomalies, flood basalts, seismic tomography, arcs, cusps, tides, the core-mantle boundary, earth’s magnetic field, the ring of fire, and many others. Students can examine and compare the evidence and tentatively decide which is the stronger theory. Teachers and parents have a simple, satisfying task: provide information, ask questions, challenge answers, and allow students the excitement of discovery.

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

This site is best viewed with a screen resolution of 1024 x 768 (XGA) or higher and a browser that supports cascading style sheets.
We have tested the site in Internet Explorer (Win), Netscape (Win), Safari (Mac), and Firefox (Mac and Win).
Please let us know if you have any suggestions or find any problems with the site.

Updated on Wednesday, May 14
Copyright © 1995–2008
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com

(602) 955-7663