• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches, Earthquakes, and the Ring of Fire
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids, Meteoroids,and Trans-Neptunian Objects
    • The Origin of Earth's Radioactivity
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

[ Frequently Asked Questions > How Did Human “Races” Develop? > References and Notes ]

References and Notes

1. The word “race,” as applied to groups of people, is never used in the King James Version and is seldom used in modern translations. The two or three uses in these modern translations come from Hebrew and Greek words that mean “family” or “offspring,” not a variety or subspecies.

2. A fourth mechanism may play a role. Experiments with a few plants and animals have shown that a hostile environment can switch on preexisting genetic machinery in a parent, so offspring are better protected. [ See Item 2 on page 8.] This may partially explain skin color variations in humans.

3. “Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859 [when Darwin wrote The Origin of Species], but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory.”  Stephen Jay Gould, Ontogeny and Phylogeny (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1977), p. 127.

u Roger Lewin, Bones of Contention (New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1987), pp. 266–267.

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

Updated on Thursday, February 27 02/27/20 14:05:05
Copyright © 1995–2020
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com